• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About Me
    • Teaching / Speaking / Events
  • Book: Governing AI
  • Book: Digital Factics X
  • AI – Artificial Intelligence
    • Ethics of AI Disclosure
  • AI Learning
    • AI Course Descriptions
  • AI Policy

Basil C. Puglisi

Digital Strategy, Content, and AI Since 2009

  • Headlines
  • My Story
    • Engagements & Moderating
  • AI Thought Leadership
    • Basil’s Brand Blog
    • Building Blocks by AI
    • Local Biz Tips
  • HAIA
  • Factics

HAIA-CARCS

SCOPE: SOURCE CUSTODY OBSERVABLE PUBLICATION EVIDENCE

June 2, 2026 by Basil Puglisi 1 Comment

a vertical flowchart showing the three SCOPE tiers with their fields, time estimates, and evidentiary strength ratings. This visualizes the core implementation decision the reader faces.

Your citations are only as strong as the record behind them. HAIA-SCOPE is a three-tier documentation protocol that records what you verified, when you verified it, and where the preserved copy lives. The record stays private until you need it. When automated enforcement flags your work or a reviewer challenges a citation, only the author who maintained a SCOPE record can produce one.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, AI Thought Leadership, Policy & Research, PR & Writing, Publishing, SOURCE CUSTODY OBSERVABLE PUBLICATION EVIDENCE, Thought Leadership, Working Papers Tagged With: AI Governance, citation verification, evidentiary record, fault-based publication ethics, HAIA-CARCS, HAIA-SCOPE, publication integrity, reference rot, source custody, Source Provenance Ledger

CARCS: Compliance Accountability Record & Case Study

April 23, 2026 by Basil Puglisi 1 Comment

CARCS governance record showing fragmented AI session traces resolving into a structured ten-section audit record through a human checkpoint.

AI work leaves plenty of trace. The problem is that those traces are scattered across platforms, organized around conversation flow, and not structured around the questions an audit actually asks. CARCS closes that gap with a ten-section governed record built from a three-part prompt suite. It works on any AI platform. Named human sign-off is required before finalization. This working paper releases the protocol for feedback and collaboration from governance practitioners, compliance officers, and researchers.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, AI Thought Leadership, Compliance Accountability Record & Case Study, Policy & Research, Thought Leadership, White Papers Tagged With: AI documentation protocol, AI Governance, audit trail, CARCS, Checkpoint-Based Governance, compliance documentation, EU AI Act, HAIA, HAIA-CARCS, Heppner ruling, human oversight, SHA-256, Working Paper

Primary Sidebar

Buy the eBook on Amazon

Multi-AI Governance

HAIA-RECCLIN Reasoning and Dispatch Third Edition free white paper promotional image with 3D book mockup and download button, March 2026, basilpuglisi.com

SAVE 25% on Governing AI, get it Publisher Direct

Save 25% on Digital Factics X, Publisher Direct

Digital Factics X

For Small Business

AI Visibility: Be the Human Voice AI Can Find

The Continued Failure in AI Literacy: AILit produced a starting point halfway through the race and called theory a framework

A Munich Court Rejected the AI Disclaimer Defense. A Frontier AI Company Answers for What It Publishes.

New York Skipped the AI Disclosure Fight. It Went Straight to Human Accountability.

The Oldest AI Law Is Already Being Enforced: GDPR and the Automated Decision

The Liability Map: The Three Channels Through Which AI Creates Legal Exposure

#SMAC #SocialMediaWeek

Basil Social Media Week

Legacy Print:

Digital Factics: Twitter

Digital Ethos Holiday Networking

Basil Speaking for Digital Ethos
RSS Search

© 2009–2026 Basil C. Puglisi, Creator of Factics™ and the HAIA Ecosystem