• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About Me
    • Teaching / Speaking / Events
  • Book: Governing AI
  • Book: Digital Factics X
  • AI – Artificial Intelligence
    • Ethics of AI Disclosure
  • AI Learning
    • AI Course Descriptions
  • AI Policy

Basil C. Puglisi

Digital Strategy, Content, and AI Since 2009

  • Headlines
  • My Story
    • Engagements & Moderating
  • AI Thought Leadership
    • Basil’s Brand Blog
    • Building Blocks by AI
    • Local Biz Tips
  • HAIA
  • Factics
  • Checkpoint-Based Governance
  • RECCLIN
  • CAIPR
  • HEQ/AIS

Main Content

AI Governance & Projects

A kitchen table at breakfast surrounded by faint panels standing for the unseen systems deciding about a person's day.

AI Was Never New. It Just Started Talking to Us Directly.

September 14, 2026 By Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

A woman applies for a car loan on a Tuesday morning. Before a human being reads her name, a model has scored her, a ranking system has chosen what she sees, and a classifier has flagged her scan.

She met artificial intelligence roughly a dozen times before lunch, and none of it said a word to her. This is the story of what AI actually is, told in the order it happened, from the era when humans wrote every rule through machine learning, deep learning, the transformer, language models, agents, and embodiment. It ends where the sequence was never resolved: nobody settled who holds authority over the decisions.

The Augmented Intelligence Score architecture

Measuring the Governance Competence at the Center of AI Literacy

September 13, 2026 By Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

The major AI literacy frameworks name governing and managing AI as a competence and stop short of measuring it. This working paper introduces the Human Enhancement Quotient, a behavior-anchored instrument that scores the governance relationship between a human authority and a machine capability inside a working decision process, with a universal floor keyed to irreversible consequence and an audit record reviewable on appeal.

HAIA-CORE run flow: sources in, score, escalation gate, edit ledger, human checkpoint, tag out.

CORE: Content Optimization Reader Evaluation, and How to Score an Article Before Anyone Reads It

September 12, 2026 By Basil Puglisi 1 Comment

Most content review checks the wrapper. Content Optimization Reader Evaluation checks the argument, the evidence, and whether anyone directed the prose.

A rubric that scores an article on substance is only useful if it stops when something is wrong. CORE scores six pillars, holds the run when a pillar fails or a source does not support its claim, and hands the decision to a person. The full prompt is included.

More Posts from this Category

AI Frameworks

The Factics Triangle showing facts, tactics, and KPIs in a cycle with a verify and adjust return path.

Factics: The Method Behind Valuable Content and Trusted AI

Why I built Factics, how I use Factics, and what Factics has held up against.I have spent most of my working life on one side or the other of an information exchange. Designing a course. Running an event. Writing an

Map of the HAIA ecosystem separating frameworks in daily use from the proposed policy and infrastructure layer.

HAIA – The Human Artificial Intelligence Assistant Ecosystem

How HAIA Came to BeThe practice and the frameworks that became the HAIA ecosystem date back to Factics in 2012. The name itself was an attempt to make communication more casual with AI after injury limited use of my right

Two tracks compare a bypassable human review with a checkpoint where a named human decides and a record is produced.

What Is Checkpoint-Based Governance? Human Authority

A person watching AI output is not the same as a person deciding it. Most organizations have the first and believe they have the second.Checkpoint-Based Governance is what makes the difference structural. It puts a named

Ten labeled fields sit between an opaque AI platform and a named human who checks the sources and decides.

What Is HAIA-RECCLIN? Reasoning and Dispatch

An AI gives you an answer. It does not give you the reasoning, the sources, the parts it was unsure about, or the disagreement it quietly resolved on your behalf.HAIA-RECCLIN is the methodology that makes it hand all of

Flow of a CAIPR session from human dispatch through isolated platform returns to audited synthesis and human decision.

What Is HAIA-CAIPR? Cross AI Platform Review

Ask one AI a hard question and the answer arrives polished and confident. Nothing inside that answer shows which parts are wrong, or what it quietly left out.HAIA-CAIPR, Cross AI Platform Review, is the governance

HEQ scoring matrix: sound method scores well either way, with the four AI literacy dimensions feeding the AIS.

What Is HEQ? AI Literacy Assessment for Governing AI

The Human Enhancement Quotient (HEQ) and the Augmented Intelligence Score (AIS): connecting AI literacy and cognitive development through governance.Inside any organization using AI, some people turn it into value and

AI Prompts & AI Tools

CARCS: Compliance Accountability Record & Case Study

AI work leaves plenty of trace. The problem is that those traces are scattered across platforms, organized around conversation flow, and not structured around the questions an audit actually asks. CARCS closes that gap with a ten-section governed record built from a three-part prompt suite. It works on any AI platform. Named human sign-off is required before finalization. This working paper releases the protocol for feedback and collaboration from governance practitioners, compliance officers, and researchers.

SCOPE: SOURCE CUSTODY OBSERVABLE PUBLICATION EVIDENCE

Your citations are only as strong as the record behind them. HAIA-SCOPE is a three-tier documentation protocol that records what you verified, when you verified it, and where the preserved copy lives. The record stays private until you need it. When automated enforcement flags your work or a reviewer challenges a citation, only the author who maintained a SCOPE record can produce one.

CORE: Content Optimization Reader Evaluation, and How to Score an Article Before Anyone Reads It

Most content review checks the wrapper. Content Optimization Reader Evaluation checks the argument, the evidence, and whether anyone directed the prose.

A rubric that scores an article on substance is only useful if it stops when something is wrong. CORE scores six pillars, holds the run when a pillar fails or a source does not support its claim, and hands the decision to a person. The full prompt is included.

Deep Dive Podcast from the Original Papers via NotebookLM

🎧 Listen on Apple 🎧 Listen on Amazon
Social Media Events, Digital Media Events, Speaker, sessions

This content is created by Basil Puglisi and may be #AIassisted using tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, or Grok. Fully AI-created material is labeled #AIgenerated. All opinions are my own. Sources are cited where possible, and third-party content is credited. Information is for learning and discussion purposes only, and should not be taken as legal, financial, or professional advice.

Primary Sidebar

Buy the eBook on Amazon

Multi-AI Governance

HAIA-RECCLIN Reasoning and Dispatch Third Edition free white paper promotional image with 3D book mockup and download button, March 2026, basilpuglisi.com

SAVE 25% on Governing AI, get it Publisher Direct

Save 25% on Digital Factics X, Publisher Direct

Digital Factics X

Legacy Blogs

The Loop That Ate the Governor

The U.S. Government Will Need to Seize AI Platforms and Data Centers if We Do Not Act

When AI Acts Between Approvals: The Gap Everyone Sees and No One Has Closed

Measuring Augmented Intelligence

GOPEL: The Code Behind the Policy

Training AI for Humanity:

#SMAC #SocialMediaWeek

Basil Social Media Week

Legacy Print:

Digital Factics: Twitter

Digital Ethos Holiday Networking

Basil Speaking for Digital Ethos
RSS Search

© 2009–2026 Basil C. Puglisi, Creator of Facticsâ„¢ and the HAIA Ecosystem