• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About Me
    • Teaching / Speaking / Events
  • Book: Governing AI
  • Book: Digital Factics X
  • AI – Artificial Intelligence
    • Ethics of AI Disclosure
  • AI Learning
    • AI Course Descriptions
  • AI Policy

@BasilPuglisi

Content & Strategy, Powered by Factics & AI, Since 2009

  • Headlines
  • My Story
    • Engagements & Moderating
  • AI Thought Leadership
  • Basil’s Brand Blog
  • Building Blocks by AI
  • Local Biz Tips
  • HAIA

Working Papers

Overwatch: Cognitive Monitoring Shield for GOPEL

May 10, 2026 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

Stylized gold shield with three convergence signals beside a locked enforcement vault on dark navy background.

A working paper documents the proof of concept for a cognitive monitoring shield that sits outside the enforcement layer it protects. The architecture answers a specific problem: how do you watch a deterministic governance engine for cognitive threats it cannot evaluate by design? Read the full design, the 2026 threat landscape that drove development, the trajectory gatekeeper for semantic manipulation, and the v2.4 calibration loop that converges rather than oscillates.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, AI Thought Leadership, Business, Code & Technical Builds, Data & CRM, Policy & Research, Workflow, Working Papers Tagged With: AI Governance, AI Security, GOPEL, HAIA-RECCLIN, MITRE ATLAS, Overwatch, OWASP Agentic, Prompt Injection, Semantic Manipulation, Trajectory Gatekeeper

How Credentialed Professionals Shape Policy When Method Governance Is Stripped

May 6, 2026 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

Side-by-side contrast: Horvath's Senate "remove technology" quote vs. his podcast "edtech actually works" statement six days earlier.

When the same cognitive neuroscientist gave the Senate one position and a podcast six days earlier the opposite, the cognitive research base supports neither. The viral oral testimony has more than two million views. Missouri HB 2230 passed the House 143-10 with witnesses citing it by name. KOSMA at the federal level is being built on this evidentiary record. This 39-page case study sets four artifacts side by side and documents how strategic ambiguity in credentialed testimony reaches policy without ever being reconciled.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, AI Thought Leadership, Mobile & Technology, Policy & Research, Thought Leadership, Working Papers Tagged With: AI in education, cognitive research, EdTech policy, four-artifact analysis, Horvath, Human-AI Collaboration, KOSMA, method governance, Missouri HB 2230, panel compounding, Senate testimony, WEIRD critique

The AI Cognitive Decline Narrative Has Not Tested What It Claims

May 4, 2026 by Basil Puglisi 1 Comment

Editorial split composition contrasting a single isolated AI beaker with a five-arm controlled study apparatus.

The peer-reviewed evidence base does not yet support the cognitive-decline claim, and it does not yet support the opposite claim either. Two scientific questions remain open: whether structured human-governed AI use accelerates cognitive development, and what augmented intelligence is in practice. This methodological audit specifies the standards the field would have to meet, scores the existing evidence against those standards, and offers HAIA-RECCLIN Reasoning, HEQ with AIS, and a five-arm randomized controlled trial design as testable counter-proposals.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Thought Leadership, Data & CRM, Policy & Research, Thought Leadership, Working Papers Tagged With: AI Governance, AIS, Checkpoint-Based Governance, Cognitive Science, Factics, HAIA-RECCLIN, HEQ, Methodological Audit, Randomized Controlled Trial

FIVE CONDITIONS OF SENTIENT LIFE

April 27, 2026 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

Editorial illustration of human silhouette facing five geometric forms around a central glowing crimson orb representing love.

What separates sentient life from sophisticated mimicry? A new working paper proposes five conditions that together constitute morally significant sentient life. Read why no current AI system satisfies all five simultaneously, and what would have to change for that conclusion to be revised.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Thought Leadership, Working Papers Tagged With: Acquaintance Knowledge, AI Governance, AI Sentience, Concurrence Principle, Five Conditions, Immortality Constraint, Moral Injury, Phronesis, Sentient Life, Working Paper

Primary Sidebar

Buy the eBook on Amazon

Multi-AI Governance

HAIA-RECCLIN Reasoning and Dispatch Third Edition free white paper promotional image with 3D book mockup and download button, March 2026, basilpuglisi.com

SAVE 25% on Governing AI, get it Publisher Direct

Save 25% on Digital Factics X, Publisher Direct

Digital Factics X

For Small Business

Facebook Groups: Build a Local Community Following Without Advertising Spend

Turn Google Reviews Smarter to Win New Customers

Save Time with AI: Let It Write Your FAQ Page Draft

Let AI Handle Your Google Profile Updates

How to Send One Customer Email That Doesn’t Get Ignored

Keep Your Google Listing Safe from Sneaky Changes

#SMAC #SocialMediaWeek

Basil Social Media Week

Legacy Print:

Digital Factics: Twitter

Digital Ethos Holiday Networking

Basil Speaking for Digital Ethos
RSS Search

@BasilPuglisi Copyright 2008, Factics™ BasilPuglisi.com, Content & Strategy, Powered by Factics & AI,