A Governance Practitioner’s Response to the Diary of a CEO Interview (PDF Here) Executive Summary Tristan Harris’s November 2025 conversation on The Diary of a CEO reached millions of viewers with a structural diagnosis of the AI race: the same incentive architecture that produced social media’s damage to democracy and mental health is now operating […]
GOPEL
Why AI Cannot Govern AI: Beyond Models to Multi-AI Platforms
1. What the Research Found On April 2, 2026, a research team at UC Berkeley and UC Santa Cruz published a study called “Peer-Preservation in Frontier Models” (Potter, Crispino, Siu, Wang, & Song, 2026). The researchers wanted to answer a straightforward question: if you assign one AI model to evaluate another AI model, and the […]
Crossing Over 1,000 Published Posts: Digital Marketing to AI
In 2009, a blog post about social media. Today, over twenty white papers, three published books with two more pending, and the operating architecture for human-AI collaboration that the industry is still figuring out how to build. This past week, after publishing post 1001, I noticed basilpuglisi.com had crossed one thousand published articles. A thousand […]
Empire of Evidence: Testing Karen Hao’s Claims Against the Governance Infrastructure They Require
A Governance Practitioner’s Examination of the Diary of a CEO Interview and Empire of AI A journalist with engineering training spent eight years investigating the AI industry and concluded that the major companies operate as empires. A governance practitioner who builds open-source infrastructure for the same industry watched the two-hour interview where she made that […]
From AI Policy to Financial System Design What US Dept of Treasury’s AI Innovation Series Actually Signals
Treasury’s March 2026 AI Innovation Series is not a standalone announcement. It is the operational phase of a two-year sequence that now treats AI adoption as a financial stability issue, a competitiveness issue, and a regulatory design issue at the same time. Failure to Adopt Is Now a Risk Category Treasury’s March 20, 2026, announcement […]
Open Letter to the UN Scientific Advisory Board on AI Deception
From Basil C. Puglisi, MPAHuman-AI Collaboration Strategist | basilpuglisi.comMarch 23, 2026 To the Members of the Scientific Advisory Board of the United Nations: The Brief of the Scientific Advisory Board on AI Deception correctly identifies a problem that practitioners working across multiple AI platforms encounter daily. Sycophancy and related deceptive behaviors are no longer theoretical […]
Open Letter to the White House on the National AI Framework
From Basil C. Puglisi, MPAHuman-AI Collaboration Strategist | basilpuglisi.com March 21, 2026 To the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the National Economic Council, and the Members of the 119th Congress Receiving These Recommendations: The White House Legislative Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence establish seven pillars that identify the right priorities: a single federal standard instead […]
HAIA-RECCLIN: Reasoning and Dispatch
Third Edition for Human AI Governance Get the PDF Here Executive Summary HAIA-RECCLIN is an operational methodology for governing AI output through structured human oversight. It comprises two capabilities: Reasoning, a ten-field output format that forces any AI platform to show its work, cite its sources, score its own confidence, flag its own conflicts, and […]
HAIA: Human Artificial Intelligence Assistant
The Name Given to the Ecosystem for Human-AI Collaboration (PDF) What It Is, Why It Exists, Where It Comes From Executive Summary HAIA stands for Human Artificial Intelligence Assistant. It is the ecosystem that structures a human’s interaction with AI, specifically with large language models, across every stage of collaboration: how the AI is instructed, […]
Checkpoint-Based Governance (CBG): A Constitutional Framework for Human-AI Collaboration
The Four Constitutional Properties Property 1Primary Purpose CBG is AI Governance. It provides human oversight and accountability for AI-assisted work. CBG’s primary purpose is to supply the governance layer that sits on top of single-platform AI output and that makes RECCLIN dispatch and CAIPR parallel review into governed learning systems rather than AI frameworks alone. […]









