• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Multi-AI Governance Blog
    • Responsible AI Blog
    • Digital Factics Blog
    • Legacy Local SEO
  • HAIA
    • SMART
  • Factics
  • Checkpoint-Based Governance
  • RECCLIN
  • CAIPR
  • HEQ/AIS
  • AI Policy
    • ISO AI Governance Comment

Basil C. Puglisi

Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Digital Marketing Since 2009

  • About Me
    • My Story
      • Teaching, Speaking, and Panels
  • Governing AI
  • Digital Factics X
  • Minds That Bend The Machine
  • Digital Factics Instagram
  • AI – Artificial Intelligence
    • Ethics of AI Disclosure
    • AI Literacy & Education
    • AI Learning
      • AI Course Descriptions

AI risk management

The Standard of Care: How NIST and ISO Are Turning Voluntary AI Governance Into a Liability Defense

June 8, 2026 by Basil Puglisi 2 Comments

Two voluntary AI standards are quietly becoming the line a court draws between reasonable and negligent. The NIST framework and ISO 42001 now carry legal and commercial weight, and the records that defend a claim are the same ones that compound an advantage. Here is where the exposure lands, and how to build the record before you need it.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, AI Policy Regulation, AI Risk, Augmented Intelligence, Business, Data & CRM, Enterprise AI, Multi-AI Governance, Policy & Research, Thought Leadership, Workflow Tagged With: AI Governance, AI Insurance, AI Liability, AI Regulation, AI risk management, Checkpoint-Based Governance, ISO 42001, NIST AI Risk Management Framework, Standard of Care

AI Governance Has No Formal Definition. Here Is One.

March 14, 2026 by Basil Puglisi 2 Comments

A single human figure standing at a governance checkpoint with hand raised, halting a flowing stream of AI outputs. Five pillars representing international standards frameworks stand behind the figure. Navy and gold color palette in clean architectural editorial style.

No standards body has defined AI Governance. No regulation locks it. After reviewing every major framework, here is the definition the field is missing. The phrase “AI Governance” appears in international treaties, executive orders, corporate reports, and academic handbooks. More than 40 countries have adopted governance principles through the OECD. The European Union built an […]

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, Multi-AI Governance, Policy & Research, Thought Leadership Tagged With: AI accountability, AI compliance, AI ethics, AI Governance, AI Governance Defined, AI Governance Definition, AI Policy, AI risk management, AI Standards, Basil Puglisi, CBG, Checkpoint-Based Governance, Define AI Governance, EU AI Act, Governance Washing, HAIA-RECCLIN, human oversight, Human-AI Collaboration, ISO 37000, ISO 38507, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, OECD AI Principles, Responsible AI, UNESCO AI

Nobody Built the Governance Layer Between Compliance and AI

February 4, 2026 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

Three-layer architecture diagram showing Regulatory Obligation (EU AI Act, prEN 18286, NIST AI RMF) at top, Operational Governance (HAIA-RECCLIN, the layer nobody built) in the middle highlighted in teal with golden accent, and AI Platforms (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity) at bottom, with dashed arrows indicating evidence flow between layers.

The AI That Said “Check My Work,” and the Ten Platforms That Confirmed It In brief: During development of a multi-AI governance framework, the primary AI platform claimed the architecture was unique. The methodology required verifying that claim across ten independent platforms. No platform found a comparable published architecture. During retesting, one platform fabricated evidence […]

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, Business, Data & CRM, Design, Multi-AI Governance, PR & Writing, Thought Leadership, Workflow Tagged With: agent architecture specification, AI audit trail, AI compliance framework, AI Governance, AI quality management system, AI regulatory compliance, AI risk management, Annex VI self-assessment, automation bias detection, Checkpoint-Based Governance, COBIT AI governance, EU AI Act compliance, HAIA-RECCLIN, human oversight AI, ISO 42001, multi-AI governance, multi-platform triangulation, NIST AI RMF, non-cognitive agent, operational governance architecture, prEN 18286, provider plurality

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

Join 9,585 other subscribers
iDBasil C. Puglisi on ORCID

Buy the eBook on Amazon

This is an banner ad for the book Governing AI When Capability Exceeds Control
Buy the book Digital Factics on Amazon

Advanced Site Search

Multi-AI Governance

HAIA-RECCLIN Reasoning and Dispatch Third Edition free white paper promotional image with 3D book mockup and download button, March 2026, basilpuglisi.com

Responsible AI (#AIgenerated by Agents)

NYC Council Puts AI Labs Under Oath: Kill Switch vs. 24-Hour Rule #AIg

Who Pays When an AI Agent Hacks: The Hawley-Murphy CFAA Bill #AIg

Watermarks Are Evidence, Not Verdicts: OpenAI’s EU Text Provenance Move #AIg

AI Rules Move to the Point of Use: Connecticut’s CART Act and Norway’s AI-Glasses Ban #AIg

Uneven AI Exposure, Not Labour Collapse: BLS and Australia Evidence #AIg

AI Literacy Splits Three Ways: China’s Mandate, Maryland’s Clock, and Code You Can’t Trust #AIg

Always-On Agents Meet Full-Stack Control: OpenAI Dots and NVIDIA Safety #AIg

More Posts from this Category

SAVE 25% on Governing AI, get it Publisher Direct

Governing AI Book in Bookstore

Save 25% on Digital Factics X, Publisher Direct

Digital Factics X

#SMAC #SocialMediaWeek

Basil Social Media Week

Legacy Print:

Digital Factics: Twitter

© 2009–2026 Basil C. Puglisi, Creator of Factics™ and the HAIA Ecosystem