Digital Strategy, Content, and AI Since 2009
Most content review checks the wrapper. Content Optimization Reader Evaluation checks the argument, the evidence, and whether anyone directed the prose.
A rubric that scores an article on substance is only useful if it stops when something is wrong. CORE scores six pillars, holds the run when a pillar fails or a source does not support its claim, and hands the decision to a person. The full prompt is included.
An article can be finished and still be two hours from published.
The gap between the two is where headings flatten, image paths break, and schema blocks ship with placeholders still in them. HAIA-WOPPA closes it. One finished article in, two documents out: every metadata field in its own copy block, and a body that takes one paste. The full tool is included.
New York let its lawyers use AI in court and skipped the disclosure form everyone expected. That is not the relief it looks like. With nothing to disclose, the whole duty lands on the signature. Here is what Part 161 changes, the two cases that show the stakes, and why accountability outlasts disclosure.
