Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Digital Marketing Since 2009
The protections exist, and the person has no way to invoke them that the next institution recognizes.
This third working paper in the AIDA series proposes a notice, written as a cease and desist, with a validation behind it built the way the parking placard is built. It maps where the notice has force today in the United States and the European Union, carries the full case against its own proposal, and puts 28 questions to the disability community.
If AI is a disability tool, are the rules restricting it unethical at best and illegal at worst?
This companion working paper maps which United States laws reach which institutions and classifies six types of AI policy risk, from outright bans to detection tools. It works a pending smart-glasses case, compares the EU AI Act, and closes with a model accommodation clause any institution can adopt.
A blind professional asks AI to describe a chart. The paper asks whether that use is assistive technology.
This working paper names the function Artificially Intelligent Disability Assistance (AIDA) and gives a three-prong test for when a use of general-purpose AI qualifies. It runs seven cases, from blindness and speech loss to post-traumatic stress, and it names the case the test excludes and the dissent it has to answer.
