• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

@BasilPuglisi

Content & Strategy, Powered by Factics & AI, Since 2009

  • Headlines
  • My Story
    • Engagements & Moderating
  • AI – Artificial Intelligence
    • Content Disclaimer
    • đź§­ AI for Professionals
  • Basil’s Brand Blog
  • Building Blocks by AI
  • Barstool Biz Blog

Content Monitoring

Demand Studios and the Impact from Google’s Algorithm Change

April 30, 2011 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

There seems to be some serious back-and-forth about the state of Demand Studios since the Google algorithm alteration. Initial impact indicated that they may have lost ground on the search driven traffic of some of their sites. Citing eHow.com as one of the locations where the change may have triggered a down-turn, Demand Studios initial statement indeed, indicated that even they knew that the new algorithm may have relatively lasting impact on their page views.

Demand Relies on SEO

Demand Media does rely heavily on search engine optimization to boost traffic to their content which is created by over 13,000 freelancers worldwide. So Google’s announcement that its change would impact almost 12 percent of search engine queries, was definitely destined to negatively affect Demands current page views by sheer numbers alone.

With sites like eHow being a large part of their company’s content, often ranking high on search engine queries before the change, and afterwards, there can be little doubt that the effect was in fact, a minor one for them. However, falling stock values are also a cause for concern for Demand. Some searches even provide Demand Studios content ranking higher than before the change.

Google Panda

Continued updates, codenamed Panda, have provided a different viewpoint altogether. Just over a week ago Google enacted the Pandora update worldwide. This time stating that two percent of Google queries in the U.S. would be affected.

Sistrix, a site that had previously released the results of impact on content farms after the first update, also released new information on the Panda change and how it has definitely affected the page views of eHow content. Although in general, the second update was not as search engine query altering as the second, or Panda update, it did land on eHow this time, even though it is rumored that it was actually one of the targets of the first update in February 2011.

Demand Demands Acknowledgement

While admitting a slight decline in search engine traffic on eHow sites due to the recent changed, Demand still insists that the Sistrix numbers are way off. Citing a predicted 2/3rds decline in eHow traffic, Demand reps responded that the numbers were greatly so grossly overstated that they must comment.

Demand CEO Richard Rosenblatt shared with MediaMemo that the relationship it shared with Google was a highly valued and mutually generous one.

They stated their relationship with Google made much sense for many reasons.

  • That they help to fill gaps in Google’s content when other high quality content is not available.
  • That they are the largest suppliers of YouTube videos.
  • That they are a huge Google Adsense partner.

Stating that the current losses are projected to cause them to suffer around 10 million dollars in lost revenue, they are assured that with projected sales this year reaching around $311 million, they do not consider it a substantial, nor a 2/3rds percent loss.

Sources:

  • All Things Digital: Demand Media
  • New York Times: Demand Media Says Traffic Hurt on eHow.com
  • Panda Update
  • Sistrix eHow Results

Filed Under: Basil's Blog #AIa, Branding & Marketing, Digital & Internet Marketing, SEO Search Engine Optimization Tagged With: blog, blogger, content, Content Monitoring, google, Marketing, PR, Press Releases, SEO, Visibility, Visibility Marketing

Plagiarism and Content Monitoring Review for Social Media Week

February 8, 2011 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

Plagiarism isn’t always purposeful as any good writer knows. Commonly certain aspects or even particular content is used and reused. For example, when a user does a product review on an HP computer, specifics, and indeed specs, such as Intel Atom, 1 GB, 250 GB, 10.1 in TFT active matrix, Microsoft Windows 7 Starter are always doomed to be repeated. Of course any user can also arrange and rearrange them to make them original, at least for any available number of combinations. Although there are still many within the above listed specs, those, in fact, do run out as well. This could make the continued review of the above HP computer eventually show up as plagiarism.

That isn’t the only example. Some places, let’s go with Hawaii, are doomed to have the same common language used to describe them. Tropical paradise, clear blue ocean water, and so on. These items can eventually build up as well to where a writer will really need to pick and choose their words with fine tooth combs to beat the plagiarism detectors.

The goal of any good content provider should be to add something to the content. A blogger is more than justified in taking sections of articles by another writer so long as they provide recognition or credit to the original source and then provide an add on to the content. The add on can be an I agree but also…., or I do not agree and here is why. This form of copied content are provided to spark original thought or new direction, as such they are worthy of original recognition.

Plagiarism Detectors

Plagiarism detectors helps users to find copies of their pages online for free,

  • Copyscape

Ranked #1 in independent tests, Copyscape protects writers and content owners from having their valuable content plagiarized elsewhere online. Everyone from bloggers, to business owners who outsource their content creation, know what Copyscape is and are likely currently using it, or have done so in the past on projects that have required it. For paid, albeit affordable cost for most, Copyscape provides two other powerful detection tools. Premium allows a user to check their offline content against all online content Sentry provides protection for a users website by scheduling a scan for weekly, or even daily, and emailing you if any are found.

  • CopyGator

CopyGator is geared towards bloggers who want to be sure their original content remains their own. Duplicate content is gauged as ‘collisions’ with three levels that explain their possible issues. From pages that share small sections of similar text, to dual post that share more than one section of similar text, to outright exact copies, CopyGator provides a very helpful service to those who take their copywriting seriously.

  • FairShare

eBook writing and blogging are very lucrative businesses these days for many, and is the reason behind a program such as FairShare.  Throw your RSS Feed URL containing your blog or eBook text into this tool and watch it go to work. This valuable, and free, service, is a lifesaver for many bloggers or eBook creators who desire to create only the highest original content work on the internet.

There are many types of copy protection to utilize, however, the best method to practice at all times is the use of only user created original content. The copy protection should only be a means to ‘double-check’ content before posting it and then monitoring your content to see where and how it is being used.

Sources:

  • Addictive Tips
  • CopyGator
  • Copyscape
  • FairShare
  • Vabytech

Filed Under: Basil's Blog #AIa, Branding & Marketing, Conferences & Education, Social Brand Visibility, Social Media Topics Tagged With: blog, Content Monitoring, Plagiarism, Puglisi, Social Brand, Social Media, Visibility, Visibility Marketing

Primary Sidebar

For Small Business

Facebook Groups: Build a Local Community Following Without Advertising Spend

Turn Google Reviews Smarter to Win New Customers

Save Time with AI: Let It Write Your FAQ Page Draft

Let AI Handle Your Google Profile Updates

How to Send One Customer Email That Doesn’t Get Ignored

Keep Your Google Listing Safe from Sneaky Changes

#AIgenerated

Spam Updates, SERP Volatility, and AI-Driven Search Shifts

Mapping the July Shake-Up: Core Update Fallout, AI Overviews, and Privacy Pull

Navigating SEO After Google’s June 2025 Core Update

Navigating SEO in a Localized, Zero-Click World

Communities Fragment, Platforms Adapt, and Trust Recalibrates #AIg

Yahoo Deliverability Shake-Up & Multi-Engine SEO in a Privacy-First World

Social Media: Monetization Races Ahead, Earnings Expand, and Burnout Surfaces #AIg

SEO Map: Core Updates, AI Overviews, and Bing’s New Copilot

YouTube Shorts, TikTok, Meta Reels, and X Accelerate Creation, Engagement, and Monetization #AIg

Surviving February’s Volatility: AI Overviews, Local Bugs, and Technical Benchmarks

Social Media: AI Tools Mature, Testing Expands, and Engagement Rules #AIg

Navigating Zero-Click SERPs and Local Volatility Now

More Posts from this Category

#SMAC #SocialMediaWeek

Basil Social Media Week

Digital Ethos Holiday Networking

Basil Speaking for Digital Ethos
RSS Search

@BasilPuglisi Copyright 2008, Factics™ BasilPuglisi.com, Content & Strategy, Powered by Factics & AI,