• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Multi-AI Governance Blog
    • Responsible AI Blog
    • Digital Factics Blog
    • Legacy Local SEO
  • HAIA
    • SMART
  • Factics
  • Checkpoint-Based Governance
    • What Is an Agent?
  • RECCLIN
  • CAIPR
  • HEQ/AIS
    • AIS pilot data test
  • AI Policy
    • ISO AI Governance Comment

Basil C. Puglisi

Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Digital Marketing Since 2009

  • About Me
    • My Story
      • Appearances for Speaking
  • The Minds That Bend The Machine
  • Governing AI
  • Digital Factics X
  • Digital Factics Instagram
  • AI – Artificial Intelligence
    • Ethical AI – Disclosure
    • AI Literacy & Education
    • AI Learning
      • AI Course Descriptions

Daily Deal Horror Stories – Are they True? #SocialCommerce

February 12, 2012 by Basil C. Puglisi Leave a Comment

Image representing LivingSocial as depicted in...
Image via CrunchBase

By now, you have likely heard some of the horror stories about businesses that have destroyed their bottom-lines, or worse, with daily deals or coupon offers. There are those like the LivingSocial deal offered by Scripa Massage & Wellness that allowed customers to save more than 88% on an enjoyable spa experience. However, the shop sold so many deals that it would have taken Scripa Massage & Wellness from three to five years to complete them all. A bad case of overselling.

80% of Merchants are Willing to Run Subsequent Deals

LivingSocial’s CEO, Tim O’Shaughnessy, shared with Business Insiders CEO Henry Blodget, that around 80 percent of businesses that run a LivingSocial daily deal, will agree to run another deal if offered. O’Shaughnessy’s response came on the heels of the questions and horror stories shared by merchants at the Social Commerce Summit in New York on February 7th.

Although O’Shaughnessy admits that they do not nail it every single time, he also insists that on the whole, it does work in just the manner the merchants advertise it. He shares that the most vital element to a daily deal such as through LivingSocial, is that the merchants upsell their products and services if they want return visitors.

The Whole Picture

Although Amazon reported that LivingSocial showed a loss of around $558 million just last year, O’Shaughnessy reiterates that those numbers do not show an accurate view of any profit or loss margins for LivingSocial. Although the biggest part of the sum was in the beginning of the year, the gap definitely narrowed towards the end of the year.

“There’s one small chart that Amazon filed that doesn’t really give a particularly illuminative view of the business. There are certain things from an accounting perspective that you can’t see with that limited of a view. It’s fun to see little snippets and extrapolate them out without the big picture.”

With around 60 million users, O’Shaughnessy also shared that aside from Groupon, LivingSocial has virtually no serious competitors currently, and that is company is doing extremely well. He also insist that as they grow, they are also learning how to more efficiently market to their consumers. If a consumer has never opened an email about for a discount on a local sports event, they probably shouldn’t be sending the emails to them anymore. LivingSocial has been working on a better way to engage those who do look for and desire their specific service offers.

Author:

@BasilPuglisi is the Executive Director and Publisher for Digital Brand Marketing Education (dbmei.com). Basil C. Puglisi is also the President of Puglisi Consulting Group, Inc. A Digital Brand Marketing Consultancy that manages professional and personal branding for Fortune 500 CEOs, Hedge Fund Managers and Small Business Owners.

Sources:

  • Businesses are Willing to Offer More Deals if Asked
  • The Horror Stories are BS! 80% of Businesses are Willing to Do More!
  • BookingBug Helps Manage Daily Deals
  • 8 Daily Deals Gone Wrong

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

Filed Under: Digital Factics Blog, General Tagged With: business, business insider, Deal of the Day (ecommerce), Groupon, Henry Blodget, LivingSocial, O'Shaughnessy, Tim O'Shaughnessy

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe

Join 9,585 other subscribers

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Alex Kalaf says

    February 17, 2012 at 11:20 am

    Most businesses lose money doing those deals even though they drive customers to the biz. Discounts are too steep & revenue sharing with the daily deal sites add to the woes. Funny how Groupon & Living Social are both pretty deep in the red! Creative accounting?? There are thousands of competitors that have popped up that are hurting the big boys bottom lines. There is also serious legislation on the horizon that will forbid expiration dates on the daily deals because consumers purchase the certificates. Good bye daily deal sites.
    P.S.-Great event yesterday at the Roger Smith Hotel!

    Loading...
    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

Join 9,585 other subscribers
iDBasil C. Puglisi on ORCID

Buy the eBook on Amazon

This is an banner ad for the book Governing AI When Capability Exceeds Control
Buy the book Digital Factics on Amazon

Advanced Site Search

Responsible AI (#AIgenerated by Agents)

India’s Telecom Regulator Would Require a Designated Officer’s Approval Before Any AI System Is Used #AIg

TRAI’s draft guidelines on responsible AI in telecom would require a designated officer to approve every AI system before use and make operators accountable for vendor-built AI. They say less about who rules on outputs once a system is running. Comments are due November 27.

Only a Quarter of UK Workers Always Verify AI Answers. Who Decides Which Ones Count? #AIg

O’Reilly found that only 24% of UK employees always verify AI-generated answers, and 39% of those using them have acted on one that proved wrong. Perceptyx and RGP point to the missing piece: deciding which AI outputs need a named person’s ruling.

New AI Certificates for Doctors and Teachers Teach Checking. Do They Certify It? #AIg

Google launched an AI certificate for healthcare professionals that takes under five hours and carries up to 5.0 CME credits, and Scale and UMSL launched a 12-hour microcredential for teachers. Both teach evaluation of AI output. A European teacher framework asks for evidence of it, and employers can too.

OpenAI Built Four Layers to Watch Its Agents. Human Paging Mostly Keeps Business Hours #AIg

OpenAI’s October 29 post describes up to four automated layers that watch its agents, then discloses that human paging runs at any hour only for highest-priority alerts on frontier training runs, during business hours for most other traffic, and is currently off for internal Codex. For enterprise deployments, alerts go to the customer’s own webhook, and on our reading so does the decision.

House Democrats Ask AI Labs for Incident Reports Within 48 Hours of Discovery #AIg

Letters dated October 27 ask five frontier AI companies for a full accounting of misalignment incidents by November 11 and notice within 48 hours of discovery. None of the fourteen requested items asks who inside a company decides a flagged event is an incident, and that decision is what starts the clock.

A New Jersey Bill Takes Reasonable Care Off the Table for Chatbot Injuries #AIg

New Jersey’s A5607, reported out of committee on October 19, would make a chatbot a product and hold its provider liable for any injury to a user from its use, even after all reasonable care. The monthly harm assessment it requires still needs a named person to decide what the numbers mean.

Europe Proposes Free Access to the Standards Behind AI Act Compliance #AIg

The European Commission proposed on October 6 to make standards referenced in EU law free to read, speed up how they are requested and assessed, and write its own common specifications when standards bodies run late. With EN 18286 now the first AI Act standard, the question is what a faster standard can certify.

More Posts from this Category

#SMAC #SocialMediaWeek

Basil Social Media Week

Legacy Print:

Digital Factics: Twitter

© 2009–2026 Basil C. Puglisi, Creator of Factics™ and the HAIA Ecosystem

%d