• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Multi-AI Governance Blog
    • Responsible AI Blog
    • Digital Factics Blog
    • Legacy Local SEO
  • HAIA
    • SMART
  • Factics
  • Checkpoint-Based Governance
    • What Is an Agent?
  • RECCLIN
  • CAIPR
  • HEQ/AIS
    • AIS pilot data test
  • AI Policy
    • ISO AI Governance Comment

Basil C. Puglisi

Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Digital Marketing Since 2009

  • About Me
    • My Story
      • Appearances for Speaking
  • The Minds That Bend The Machine
  • Governing AI
  • Digital Factics X
  • Digital Factics Instagram
  • AI – Artificial Intelligence
    • Ethical AI – Disclosure
    • AI Literacy & Education
    • AI Learning
      • AI Course Descriptions

Social Brand Visibility: OldDogg.com

February 10, 2011 by Basil C. Puglisi Leave a Comment

Once upon a time, many years ago, there was a company called Netscape. Founded in 1994, it was a US computer services company known for its web browser.  Netscape was once dominant in usage share, had some interesting and vital improvements, like JavaScript that enables users to see the result of coding. Unfortunately it lost the war to Internet Explorer, in what is called The First Browser War.

Netscape became a subsidiary of AOL after the giant purchased the company in 2007. It was acquired as a bargaining chip, people believed, against Microsoft, trying to show the big company they can spread their wings and be less dependent on web browsing.

AOL later filed a law suit against Microsoft which was settled out of court with Microsoft paying $750 million to AOL. A month later Netscape was disbanded. What was left of Netscape evolved into Propeller.com, a Social Media aggregator, similar to another social network, Digg.com.  In both cases, users submit stories and members can vote them up or down. The most ‘liked’ stories make the front page. It also enables other users to comment on the story and create a conversation chain.

Unfortunately Propeller did not live up to its promise and failed to attract enough following.  In 2010 this massage was posted on their site:

“As of October 2010, Propeller will no longer be active. To the loyal users of this site, we extend our thanks. Keep talking about the news that matters most to you, and share it with your friends, both online and off. Team Propeller”.

But one man’s misfortune can be another man’s gain, if you can read the map correctly and the stars are aligned:

Digg.com came out with a disliked Version 4 at the beginning of October, which created a user revolt. Users really did not like the new version. Propeller was gone, leaving more users looking for a new platform.

BigDogg.com was launched. The site got 27,000 votes and 1,500 comments in just 25 days. Former Digg.com users are now top users of OldDogg.com.

OldDogg.com was created by a 27 year old graduate student from the UK, after a Twitter conversation. It took him 4 hours to put it all together and upload it, and it went live. 20 hours later the site had an active user base.

It basically works the same as Propeller did; users submit links to stories, images and videos from all around the net. The links are voted up or down by popular voice and communication between users in available in the form of comments and conversations.

This sets the stage to the biggest competition: Digg.com or Olddogg.com?

Looking at both home pages you’ll find that the new guy – the Old Dogg – is much more user friendly and more visually appealing. The stories are well defined and easy to read.

Its audience tends to be those of childless men, with a moderate to high income, who are browsing from home.

Sources:

  • Alexa
  • Digg
  • Mashable
  • Old Dogg
  • PrLog: 27000 Votes in 25 Days thats the way to launch community “Old Dogg”
  • Search Engine Journal
  • Wikipedia

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

Filed Under: Branding & Marketing, Conferences & Education, Digital Factics Blog, Social Brand Visibility, Social Media Topics Tagged With: Social Brand, Social Media, Visibility, Visibility Marketing

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe

Join 9,585 other subscribers

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

Join 9,585 other subscribers
iDBasil C. Puglisi on ORCID

How to Learn About AI

The Minds That Bend the Machine by Basil C. Puglisi, MPA. Book promotion exploring artificial intelligence, bias, power, and humanity. Releases November 6, 2026.

Buy the eBook on Amazon

This is an banner ad for the book Governing AI When Capability Exceeds Control
Buy the book Digital Factics on Amazon

Advanced Site Search

Responsible AI (#AIgenerated by Agents)

Bank Examiners Get a New Question: Is the Human Approval More Than a Click? #AIg

The OCC’s new supervisory framework for bank use of super intelligence tells examiners to test whether a human approval is more than a nominal click, flags a named reviewer without practical authority as a risk, and lets the degree of human oversight shape the risk tier.

New Suits Against OpenAI Ask Courts to Put an Outside Reviewer Over ChatGPT Releases #AIg

Two lawsuits filed in late October ask courts to put an outside reviewer between OpenAI and its next release: a court-approved evaluator in Texas and a five-year independent monitor in the Wan case. A third suit asks for automatic escalation. The requests show what injured parties will ask any chatbot company to prove.

NIST’s Agent Identity Tenets Warn That Human Review Can Turn Into Habit #AIg

NIST’s ten design tenets for agent identity management put most controls in infrastructure and send risky actions to human review. Tenet 05 warns that frequent escalation can turn approval into habit, and leaves who rules, and what record that ruling leaves, to each organization.

India’s Telecom Regulator Would Require a Designated Officer’s Approval Before Any AI System Is Used #AIg

TRAI’s draft guidelines on responsible AI in telecom would require a designated officer to approve every AI system before use and make operators accountable for vendor-built AI. They say less about who rules on outputs once a system is running. Comments are due November 27.

Only a Quarter of UK Workers Always Verify AI Answers. Who Decides Which Ones Count? #AIg

O’Reilly found that only 24% of UK employees always verify AI-generated answers, and 39% of those using them have acted on one that proved wrong. Perceptyx and RGP point to the missing piece: deciding which AI outputs need a named person’s ruling.

New AI Certificates for Doctors and Teachers Teach Checking. Do They Certify It? #AIg

Google launched an AI certificate for healthcare professionals that takes under five hours and carries up to 5.0 CME credits, and Scale and UMSL launched a 12-hour microcredential for teachers. Both teach evaluation of AI output. A European teacher framework asks for evidence of it, and employers can too.

OpenAI Built Four Layers to Watch Its Agents. Human Paging Mostly Keeps Business Hours #AIg

OpenAI’s October 29 post describes up to four automated layers that watch its agents, then discloses that human paging runs at any hour only for highest-priority alerts on frontier training runs, during business hours for most other traffic, and is currently off for internal Codex. For enterprise deployments, alerts go to the customer’s own webhook, and on our reading so does the decision.

More Posts from this Category

#SMAC #SocialMediaWeek

Basil Social Media Week

Legacy Print:

Digital Factics: Twitter

© 2009–2026 Basil C. Puglisi, Creator of Factics™ and the HAIA Ecosystem

%d