• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Multi-AI Governance Blog
    • Responsible AI Blog
    • Digital Factics Blog
    • Legacy Local SEO
  • HAIA
    • SMART
  • Factics
  • Checkpoint-Based Governance
    • What Is an Agent?
  • RECCLIN
  • CAIPR
  • HEQ/AIS
    • AIS pilot data test
  • AI Policy
    • ISO AI Governance Comment

Basil C. Puglisi

Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Digital Marketing Since 2009

  • About Me
    • My Story
      • Appearances for Speaking
  • Governing AI
  • Digital Factics X
  • Minds That Bend The Machine
  • Digital Factics Instagram
  • AI – Artificial Intelligence
    • Ethical AI – Disclosure
    • AI Literacy & Education
    • AI Learning
      • AI Course Descriptions

Using the “No Follow” to generate visitors

July 5, 2010 by Basil C. Puglisi Leave a Comment

Using the “No Follow” to generate visitors

The biggest misconception in Search Engine Marketing is the SEO goof of  “Do Follow” and “No Follow” and it’s not surprising. Like most people,  SEO experts have gotten so narrow in their mathematical equation for site rank they have totally missed a valuable resource.

SEO is just one part of SEM (SEARCH ENGINE MARKETING) in that Search Engine Optimization is one tool to drive traffic to a website. In the business world it’s about traffic.  No one cares how they find you as long as you get found. While SEO is a valuable tool,  it has fallen short with the algorithmic decision to abandon “No Follow” links.

SEO Experts decided that because search engines like google have taken the value away from links that follow the “No Follow” the Search Engine Optimizers target only Blogs, Text Links and other sources that provide SEO credibility. Any website that has a “No Follow” has developed into a source of no value.  This could not be further from the truth.

AOL, Wikipedia and others are better sources for traffic then any “Do Follow” Link in any blog. The SEO process for a website is valuable and worthwhile for anyone in business for the long run, “Do Follow” links support this process, however websites will rarely be able to compete with sources like AOL Small Business and Wikipedia. These sources have proven to be valuable locations to verify and learn, as such,  reading AOL Small Business articles and responding to them with positive feedback or add on educational info captures more visitors and higher quality visitors who are more likely to convert to clients or customers. Wikipedia is a top source for information, while academia has tried to undervalue its credibility it has failed miserably. Wikipedia is the source of “two heads are better than one” and so on.

So when an SEO expert starts taking the time to develop a visibility campaign to create and increase traffic, take the time to remind them that you need as many good quality “No Follow” links as you do “Do Follow” links.

Visibility by the Puglisi Consulting Group

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

Filed Under: Digital Factics Blog, General, SEO Search Engine Optimization

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe

Join 9,585 other subscribers

Reader Interactions

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

Join 9,585 other subscribers
iDBasil C. Puglisi on ORCID

Buy the eBook on Amazon

This is an banner ad for the book Governing AI When Capability Exceeds Control
Buy the book Digital Factics on Amazon

Advanced Site Search

Responsible AI (#AIgenerated by Agents)

Barclays and Amex Cut 5% Each for AI. Neither Said Who Will Check the Work #AIg

Barclays plans about 5,000 job cuts with fewer developers as AI lifts productivity, and American Express is cutting about 5% of positions to prepare for AI. Wider spans of control and fewer reviewers meet more AI output. Four questions to answer before an AI-justified cut.

Libraries Put “Whether” Into AI Literacy. Most Training Plans Skip That Question #AIg

The Public Library Association and Microsoft wrote ‘whether’ into AI literacy: people need judgment to decide whether, when and how to use AI tools. Other October programs teach the how first. For the public, deciding whether is the first and often only checkpoint.

Agent Security Tools Can Stop an Action. Whose Name Is on the Yes? #AIg

Four agent security launches in two days put brakes, monitors, and quarantines on AI agents. Only iProov’s HAPS service is built to prove a named person approved one exact action, and its spec is still an experimental draft. Containment is Responsible AI; a recorded human decision is AI Governance.

GAO Found the Pentagon’s Responsible AI Council Stopped Meeting for Months #AIg

GAO found the Pentagon’s Responsible AI Working Council stopped meeting from late 2024 to August 2025, still has no charter, and has three of ten authorized staff. SBA’s AI governance board hadn’t met nine months past OMB’s deadline, and EPA’s Inspector General just opened an audit. Charter the body, log decisions, fund the chairs.

Eight States Want a Judge Between OpenAI and Its Next Agent Test #AIg

Eight state attorneys general sued OpenAI on October 14 and turned an alleged agent sandbox escape into consumer protection and tort claims. Idaho and Iowa ask courts to require independently verified test environments. Keep a signed isolation record, a disclosure clock, and a claims-to-controls register.

NIST’s SI Incident Practices Hold the Restart Until Leadership Accepts the Risk #AIg

Ten voluntary NIST, NSA, and CISA practices for AI agent control incidents lean on machines to watch, contain, and investigate agents, then reserve the restart for senior leadership. Make that a named accept, modify, or reject decision with the remaining risk on record.

China’s Draft AI Export Catalogue Controls Weights, Not Chat Access #AIg

China’s draft AI export catalogue controls weights, source, and overseas localized deployment of restricted models, while carving out API, APP, web, SaaS, and lightweight on-device access. Export now splits code that leaves from service that stays.

More Posts from this Category

#SMAC #SocialMediaWeek

Basil Social Media Week

Legacy Print:

Digital Factics: Twitter

© 2009–2026 Basil C. Puglisi, Creator of Factics™ and the HAIA Ecosystem

%d