• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Multi-AI Governance Blog
    • Responsible AI Blog
    • Digital Factics Blog
    • Legacy Local SEO
  • HAIA
    • SMART
  • Factics
  • Checkpoint-Based Governance
  • RECCLIN
  • CAIPR
  • HEQ/AIS
  • AI Policy
    • ISO AI Governance Comment

Basil C. Puglisi

Digital Strategy, Content, and AI Since 2009

  • About Me
    • My Story
      • Teaching, Speaking, and Panels
  • Governing AI
  • Digital Factics X
  • Minds That Bend The Machine
  • Digital Factics Instagram
  • AI – Artificial Intelligence
    • Ethics of AI Disclosure
    • AI Learning
      • AI Course Descriptions

AI Regulation

Humans Are Optional When Defining AI Governance for ISO, According to the U.S. Technical Advisory Group

September 22, 2026 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

Side by side panels comparing the ISO DIS 21520 Clause 3.2 AI governance definition with the rejected human authority version

A standards body just wrote down that AI governance can exist without a human in control.

In September 2026 the U.S. TAG to ISO/TC 258 answered a public comment on the draft AI standard for project management. It accepted two editorial corrections and rejected the one that would have put binding human authority and attributable accountability inside the definition. This is the filing, the four reasons for the rejection, and why a definition without a governor fails the moral test the public is already applying.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, AI Policy Regulation, Multi-AI Governance, Policy & Research, Thought Leadership Tagged With: AI accountability, AI Governance, AI Governance Definition, AI Policy, AI Regulation, AI Standards, Checkpoint-Based Governance, human oversight, ISO 21520, ISO TC 258, public trust in AI, Responsible AI

The AI HOAX Distraction: Safety, Money, and Why You Can’t Tell Which Is Driving

September 17, 2026 by Basil Puglisi 3 Comments

Dark server monolith looms over a crowd under a WE THE PEOPLE banner while two groups argue from money piles

Six positions in nine days, and every one of them fits the speaker’s balance sheet.

In September 2026 four frontier labs called for a slowdown, the President called the whole thing a hoax, and two of the largest companies in AI said the market already handles it. This piece argues the slowdown is not evidence that governance is working. It is evidence that economic incentives are still in charge, with the sign flipped. Readers get the dated exposure curve behind the calls, the reason liability cannot currently steer, and a narrower proposal than pacing the frontier.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, AI Policy Regulation, AI Risk, Augmented Intelligence, Business, Code & Technical Builds, Multi-AI Governance, Policy & Research, Thought Leadership Tagged With: agentic AI, AI accountability, AI Governance, AI Insurance, AI Liability, AI Policy, AI Regulation, AI safety, Checkpoint-Based Governance, Dario Amodei, Economic Override Pattern, EU AI Act, product liability, provider plurality

The Standard of Care: How NIST and ISO Are Turning Voluntary AI Governance Into a Liability Defense

June 8, 2026 by Basil Puglisi 2 Comments

Two voluntary AI standards are quietly becoming the line a court draws between reasonable and negligent. The NIST framework and ISO 42001 now carry legal and commercial weight, and the records that defend a claim are the same ones that compound an advantage. Here is where the exposure lands, and how to build the record before you need it.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, AI Policy Regulation, AI Risk, Augmented Intelligence, Business, Data & CRM, Enterprise AI, Multi-AI Governance, Policy & Research, Thought Leadership, Workflow Tagged With: AI Governance, AI Insurance, AI Liability, AI Regulation, AI risk management, Checkpoint-Based Governance, ISO 42001, NIST AI Risk Management Framework, Standard of Care

Empire of Evidence: Testing Karen Hao’s Claims Against the Governance Infrastructure They Require

March 28, 2026 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

White paper examining Karen Hao Empire of AI claims against AI governance infrastructure including AI Provider Plurality and Economic Override Pattern

A Governance Practitioner’s Examination of the Diary of a CEO Interview and Empire of AI A journalist with engineering training spent eight years investigating the AI industry and concluded that the major companies operate as empires. A governance practitioner who builds open-source infrastructure for the same industry watched the two-hour interview where she made that […]

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, Code & Technical Builds, Conferences & Education, Multi-AI Governance, Policy & Research, Thought Leadership Tagged With: AI data centers, AI Governance, AI Policy, AI provider plurality, AI Regulation, AlphaFold, checkpoint based governance, data annotation, Diary of a CEO, Economic Override Pattern, Empire of AI, GOPEL, HAIA, HAIA-CAIPR, Karen Hao, multi-AI governance, openai, Responsible AI, Timnit Gebru, Waymo

The U.S. Government Will Need to Seize AI Platforms and Data Centers if We Do Not Act

March 1, 2026 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

When Extinction Odds Meet National Security Logic, the Question Is Not Whether Government Acts but How

The Warning, the Override, and the Infrastructure We Have Not Built When Extinction Odds Meet National Security Logic, the Question Is Not Whether Government Acts but How 1. The Warning That Changes State Logic A single probability estimate from a credible pioneer can change the posture of an entire state. Geoffrey Hinton, the 2024 Nobel […]

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, Business, Code & Technical Builds, Mobile & Technology, Multi-AI Governance, Policy & Research, Thought Leadership Tagged With: AI Governance, AI Infrastructure, AI Policy, AI provider plurality, AI Regulation, AI safety, Anthropic, Checkpoint-Based Governance, Economic Override Pattern, Federal Policy, Frontier AI, Geoffrey Hinton, GOPEL, Human-AI Collaboration, National Security, openai, Pentagon, Public Infrastructure, Supply Chain Risk, Surveillance

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

Join 9,586 other subscribers
iDBasil C. Puglisi on ORCID

Buy the eBook on Amazon

这是一则关于《当能力超越控制时的人工智能治理》一书的横幅广告
在亚马逊购买《数字事实》一书

Advanced Site Search

Categories

  • Digital Factics Blog (731)
  • Social Media Topics (252)
  • Branding & Marketing (250)
  • Conferences & Education (248)

Tags

  • Visibility (251)
  • Social Media (237)
  • Visibility Marketing (168)
  • Social Brand (156)
  • brand (137)

Year

  • 2026 (98)
  • 2025 (80)
  • 2024 (79)
  • 2023 (37)
  • 2022 (15)

Multi-AI Governance

HAIA-RECCLIN推理和调度第三版免费白皮书宣传图片,包含3D书籍模型和下载按钮,2026年3月,basilpuglisi.com

Responsible AI (#AIgenerated by Agents)

AI Literacy Splits Three Ways: China’s Mandate, Maryland’s Clock, and Code You Can’t Trust #AIg

Always-On Agents Meet Full-Stack Control: OpenAI Dots and NVIDIA Safety #AIg

Two Oversight Gates in 48 Hours: Federal Digital Commission vs AI Safety Board #AIg

Autonomy Is Not a Defense: AI Agent Hacks Meet California Liability Law #AIg

Trump Renames Federal AI Language to Super Intelligence #AIg

The Search Tightrope in Plain View: What Liz Reid Just Told Us About Google’s AI Future

Spam Updates, SERP Volatility, and AI-Driven Search Shifts

More Posts from this Category

SAVE 25% on Governing AI, get it Publisher Direct

人工智能治理书籍在书店

Save 25% on Digital Factics X, Publisher Direct

Digital Factics X

#SMAC #SocialMediaWeek

Basil社交媒体周

Legacy Print:

数字事实:Twitter

© 2009–2026 Basil C. Puglisi, Creator of Factics™ and the HAIA Ecosystem