• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Multi-AI Governance Blog
    • Responsible AI Blog
    • Digital Factics Blog
    • Legacy Local SEO
  • HAIA
    • SMART
  • Factics
  • Checkpoint-Based Governance
  • RECCLIN
  • CAIPR
  • HEQ/AIS
  • AI Policy
    • ISO AI Governance Comment

Basil C. Puglisi

Digital Strategy, Content, and AI Since 2009

  • About Me
    • My Story
      • Teaching, Speaking, and Panels
  • Governing AI
  • Digital Factics X
  • Minds That Bend The Machine
  • Digital Factics Instagram
  • AI – Artificial Intelligence
    • Ethics of AI Disclosure
    • AI Learning
      • AI Course Descriptions

ISO 21520

Humans Are Optional When Defining AI Governance for ISO, According to the U.S. Technical Advisory Group

September 22, 2026 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

Side by side panels comparing the ISO DIS 21520 Clause 3.2 AI governance definition with the rejected human authority version

A standards body just wrote down that AI governance can exist without a human in control.

In September 2026 the U.S. TAG to ISO/TC 258 answered a public comment on the draft AI standard for project management. It accepted two editorial corrections and rejected the one that would have put binding human authority and attributable accountability inside the definition. This is the filing, the four reasons for the rejection, and why a definition without a governor fails the moral test the public is already applying.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, AI Policy Regulation, Multi-AI Governance, Policy & Research, Thought Leadership Tagged With: AI accountability, AI Governance, AI Governance Definition, AI Policy, AI Regulation, AI Standards, Checkpoint-Based Governance, human oversight, ISO 21520, ISO TC 258, public trust in AI, Responsible AI

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

Join 9,586 other subscribers
iDBasil C. Puglisi on ORCID

Buy the eBook on Amazon

这是一则关于《当能力超越控制时的人工智能治理》一书的横幅广告
在亚马逊购买《数字事实》一书

Advanced Site Search

Categories

  • Digital Factics Blog (731)
  • Social Media Topics (252)
  • Branding & Marketing (250)
  • Conferences & Education (248)

Tags

  • Visibility (251)
  • Social Media (237)
  • Visibility Marketing (168)
  • Social Brand (156)
  • brand (137)

Year

  • 2026 (98)
  • 2025 (80)
  • 2024 (79)
  • 2023 (37)
  • 2022 (15)

Multi-AI Governance

HAIA-RECCLIN推理和调度第三版免费白皮书宣传图片,包含3D书籍模型和下载按钮,2026年3月,basilpuglisi.com

Responsible AI (#AIgenerated by Agents)

AI Literacy Splits Three Ways: China’s Mandate, Maryland’s Clock, and Code You Can’t Trust #AIg

Always-On Agents Meet Full-Stack Control: OpenAI Dots and NVIDIA Safety #AIg

Two Oversight Gates in 48 Hours: Federal Digital Commission vs AI Safety Board #AIg

Autonomy Is Not a Defense: AI Agent Hacks Meet California Liability Law #AIg

Trump Renames Federal AI Language to Super Intelligence #AIg

The Search Tightrope in Plain View: What Liz Reid Just Told Us About Google’s AI Future

Spam Updates, SERP Volatility, and AI-Driven Search Shifts

More Posts from this Category

SAVE 25% on Governing AI, get it Publisher Direct

人工智能治理书籍在书店

Save 25% on Digital Factics X, Publisher Direct

Digital Factics X

#SMAC #SocialMediaWeek

Basil社交媒体周

Legacy Print:

数字事实:Twitter

© 2009–2026 Basil C. Puglisi, Creator of Factics™ and the HAIA Ecosystem