• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Multi-AI Governance Blog
    • Responsible AI Blog
    • Digital Factics Blog
    • Legacy Local SEO
  • HAIA
    • SMART
  • Factics
  • Checkpoint-Based Governance
  • RECCLIN
  • CAIPR
  • HEQ/AIS
  • AI Policy
    • ISO AI Governance Comment

Basil C. Puglisi

Digital Strategy, Content, and AI Since 2009

  • About Me
    • My Story
      • Teaching, Speaking, and Panels
  • Governing AI
  • Digital Factics X
  • Minds That Bend The Machine
  • Digital Factics Instagram
  • AI – Artificial Intelligence
    • Ethics of AI Disclosure
    • AI Learning
      • AI Course Descriptions

Part 161

A Munich Court Rejected the AI Disclaimer Defense. A Frontier AI Company Answers for What It Publishes.

June 17, 2026 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

Editorial image linking a navy courthouse to a dissolving search card, illustrating accountability for AI output.

A German court just told Google it answers for what its AI publishes. The Munich ruling treats AI Overviews as Google’s own statements, not safe search results, and says the disclaimer does not transfer the duty. Read what the decision means for AI accountability and why it mirrors New York’s Part 161 from the other end.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, AI Policy Regulation, AI Risk, Business, Digital Factics Blog, Enterprise AI, Multi-AI Governance, Policy & Research, Search Engines, Thought Leadership Tagged With: AI accountability, AI Governance, AI Liability, AI Overviews, Checkpoint-Based Governance, google, Part 161

New York Skipped the AI Disclosure Fight. It Went Straight to Human Accountability.

June 15, 2026 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

Part 161 flow: the sanctions and privilege risk, the named-human signature checkpoint, and the defense and scale reward.

New York let its lawyers use AI in court and skipped the disclosure form everyone expected. That is not the relief it looks like. With nothing to disclose, the whole duty lands on the signature. Here is what Part 161 changes, the two cases that show the stakes, and why accountability outlasts disclosure.

Filed Under: AI Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, AI Policy Regulation, AI Risk, Business, Business Networking, Multi-AI Governance, Policy & Research Tagged With: AI disclosure, AI Governance, attorney ethics, Checkpoint-Based Governance, Legal AI, legal malpractice, New York courts, Part 161

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

Join 9,586 other subscribers
iDBasil C. Puglisi on ORCID

Buy the eBook on Amazon

这是一则关于《当能力超越控制时的人工智能治理》一书的横幅广告
在亚马逊购买《数字事实》一书

Advanced Site Search

Categories

  • Digital Factics Blog (731)
  • Social Media Topics (252)
  • Branding & Marketing (250)
  • Conferences & Education (248)

Tags

  • Visibility (251)
  • Social Media (237)
  • Visibility Marketing (168)
  • Social Brand (156)
  • brand (137)

Year

  • 2026 (98)
  • 2025 (80)
  • 2024 (79)
  • 2023 (37)
  • 2022 (15)

Multi-AI Governance

HAIA-RECCLIN推理和调度第三版免费白皮书宣传图片,包含3D书籍模型和下载按钮,2026年3月,basilpuglisi.com

Responsible AI (#AIgenerated by Agents)

AI Literacy Splits Three Ways: China’s Mandate, Maryland’s Clock, and Code You Can’t Trust #AIg

Always-On Agents Meet Full-Stack Control: OpenAI Dots and NVIDIA Safety #AIg

Two Oversight Gates in 48 Hours: Federal Digital Commission vs AI Safety Board #AIg

Autonomy Is Not a Defense: AI Agent Hacks Meet California Liability Law #AIg

Trump Renames Federal AI Language to Super Intelligence #AIg

The Search Tightrope in Plain View: What Liz Reid Just Told Us About Google’s AI Future

Spam Updates, SERP Volatility, and AI-Driven Search Shifts

More Posts from this Category

SAVE 25% on Governing AI, get it Publisher Direct

人工智能治理书籍在书店

Save 25% on Digital Factics X, Publisher Direct

Digital Factics X

#SMAC #SocialMediaWeek

Basil社交媒体周

Legacy Print:

数字事实:Twitter

© 2009–2026 Basil C. Puglisi, Creator of Factics™ and the HAIA Ecosystem