• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Multi-AI Governance Blog
    • Responsible AI Blog
    • Digital Factics Blog
    • Legacy Local SEO
  • HAIA
    • SMART
  • Factics
  • Checkpoint-Based Governance
  • RECCLIN
  • CAIPR
  • HEQ/AIS
  • AI Policy
    • ISO AI Governance Comment

Basil C. Puglisi

Digital Strategy, Content, and AI Since 2009

  • About Me
    • My Story
      • Teaching, Speaking, and Panels
  • Governing AI
  • Digital Factics X
  • Minds That Bend The Machine
  • Digital Factics Instagram
  • AI – Artificial Intelligence
    • Ethics of AI Disclosure
    • AI Learning
      • AI Course Descriptions

Copyrighting Color: How (And Why) To Do It

January 11, 2013 by Basil Puglisi Leave a Comment

 
image sourceMarketing studies suggest that over 80% of visual information is related to colour. Seem unlikely? Try and picture the following in your mind: Coca-Cola, Starbucks, Cadbury and O2. Roughly 90% of you just saw specific shades of red, green, purple and blue. Not a phrase, not an advert, just those colours and maybe a vague logo.
It’s only recently companies have begun to appreciate how vital this aspect of brand management is, and to litigate accordingly: in the past few years Cadbury’s have trademarked their particular shade of purple; T-Mobile have sued a blog for using magenta in their logo; and Orange have laid claim not only to the colour but also the word itself.
For designers it’s a nightmare: with an ever-dwindling colour palette, creating that stand-out design becomes increasingly difficult. But there are plus sides. It’s harder than ever for copycat businesses to leech off your brand, and once you hit upon that perfect combination, the law will protect it as ferociously as your tagline.

Who Can Copyright a Colour?

Short answer: anyone. In the UK, trademarking your logo automatically registers those colours to your brand, and yours alone. There are, however, certain restrictions. Obviously, you need to check if anyone else has a claim on this colour first, and hold back all that design-money until you’re sure.
Secondly, your logo will need to pass the functionality test. This prevents companies from trademarking colours with pre-existing psychological or cultural associations. We associate green with nature, life, ‘organic’ products; therefore you will be unable to pursue a claim on green, unless you are working in a field where that association simply wouldn’t apply (e.g.: telecommunications).
Depending on your industry, defining functionality could get complicated. Louboutin spent a ton of money dragging Yves Saint Laurent through the courts last year, in an attempt to protect their red-soled shoe from imitation. While they did manage to get limited trademark, it only applies in very specific circumstances, with one judge ruling that, due to the nature of the fashion industry, all colour was essentially functional.

How to Get Your Colour-Scheme Protected

So you have a distinct colour-scheme for a unique product in your field that passes the functionality test. What’s the next step? According to U.S law, that colour needs to have taken on a ‘secondary meaning’ in the eyes of the public. Simply put: you can’t trademark cyan for your tableware range, unless a good chunk of the population now associate cyan with your cutlery. Therefore, you need to have been making this product range, without the help of copyright law, for some time already.
It’s not just the USA either. Australian law requires a ‘record of colour use’ before a trademark will be considered, with the colour in question being used ‘intensively and extensively’ over a period of time. After all, if you could pre-emptively trademark a colour the system would be wide open to abuse from professional litigants. Make sure the colour is demonstrably yours.

How It Will Apply

First, your trademark will only apply in your industry. While T-Mobile may have sued a blog for using magenta, the blog in question was concerned with mobile phones; AKA telecommunications, AKA T-Mobile’s industry. If I want to open a delivery service tomorrow and spray all my trucks magenta, there’s nothing they can do about it. Colours are defined by industry.
Secondly, you will only be protected worldwide if you apply to be. In the EU this is via a Community Trade Mark. Make no mistake, what you consider ‘your’ colour may already be in use elsewhere in the world, and will cause a severe headache if you end up going global. Just see the difficulty faced by apple bringing their trademarked ‘iTV’ over to the UK (where the name doesn’t carry quite the same connotations).
At the end of the day, copyrighting colour is a minefield any growing business will need to navigate. While it may seem a headache, try and imagine how you’ll feel if a rival company gets there first.

Attached Images:
  •  License: Creative Commons image source
  •  License: Creative Commons image source

Article contributed by Alfie Davenport, who writes for a printing and binding company, PrintExpress.co.uk; who are specialists in booklets, catalogues and business card printing.

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

Filed Under: Digital Factics Blog, General, Guest Bloggers, PR & Writing

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe

Join 9,586 other subscribers

Reader Interactions

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe via Email

Join 9,586 other subscribers
iDBasil C. Puglisi on ORCID

Buy the eBook on Amazon

这是一则关于《当能力超越控制时的人工智能治理》一书的横幅广告
在亚马逊购买《数字事实》一书

Advanced Site Search

Categories

  • Digital Factics Blog (731)
  • Social Media Topics (252)
  • Branding & Marketing (250)
  • Conferences & Education (248)

Tags

  • Visibility (251)
  • Social Media (237)
  • Visibility Marketing (168)
  • Social Brand (156)
  • brand (137)

Year

  • 2026 (98)
  • 2025 (80)
  • 2024 (79)
  • 2023 (37)
  • 2022 (15)

Multi-AI Governance

HAIA-RECCLIN推理和调度第三版免费白皮书宣传图片,包含3D书籍模型和下载按钮,2026年3月,basilpuglisi.com

Responsible AI (#AIgenerated by Agents)

Uneven AI Exposure, Not Labour Collapse: BLS and Australia Evidence #AIg

AI Literacy Splits Three Ways: China’s Mandate, Maryland’s Clock, and Code You Can’t Trust #AIg

Always-On Agents Meet Full-Stack Control: OpenAI Dots and NVIDIA Safety #AIg

Two Oversight Gates in 48 Hours: Federal Digital Commission vs AI Safety Board #AIg

Autonomy Is Not a Defense: AI Agent Hacks Meet California Liability Law #AIg

Trump Renames Federal AI Language to Super Intelligence #AIg

The Search Tightrope in Plain View: What Liz Reid Just Told Us About Google’s AI Future

More Posts from this Category

SAVE 25% on Governing AI, get it Publisher Direct

人工智能治理书籍在书店

Save 25% on Digital Factics X, Publisher Direct

Digital Factics X

#SMAC #SocialMediaWeek

Basil社交媒体周

Legacy Print:

数字事实:Twitter

© 2009–2026 Basil C. Puglisi, Creator of Factics™ and the HAIA Ecosystem

%d